Lindquist, von Husen & Joyce LLP.

  • About
    • Mission & Values
    • Leadership
    • BKR International
    • Our History
  • Services
    • Audit & Attestation
    • Tax
    • Business Advisory & Other Services
  • Expertise
    • Affordable Housing & Real Estate
      • CAS+ for Affordable Housing
    • Not-For-Profits
    • Individuals & Families
    • Closely Held Businesses
    • Client Success Stories
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Tax Guide
  • News & Events
    • Firm News
    • Events
    • Industry News
  • Careers
    • Benefits
    • Professional Development
    • Life at LvHJ
    • Meet Our People
    • Open Positions
  • Contact
  • Client Portal

Client Portal

Forgot password?

States Scrutinize Joint Cost Allocation and GIK Reporting

February 01, 2019   |   Posted in: Not For Profit

State regulators in several states, including California, are bringing enforcement actions against not-for-profit organizations, citing “materially false statements” specific to joint cost allocations reporting and gifts in kind valuations. The rules underlying these accounting and financial statement reporting activities are highly technical and, if misstated and not closely reviewed during an independent audit, can lead to enforcement actions, legal costs, damage to the nonprofit’s reputation and dire impacts on future development and programming.

With all of those concerns in mind, it’s imperative to:

  • have a well-trained accounting staff and board;
  • work with a CPA firm that is highly knowledgeable in not-for-profit accounting, reporting and auditing, and;
  • educate development staff on proper use of financial data and programming “calls to action” in fundraising activities.

All of this seems like common sense, but an article in The Nonprofit Times noted that not-for-profit organizations can make mistakes when allocating costs between fundraising, management and programming. They also make mistakes in the acceptance, use and accounting for non-cash contributions, also known as gifts in kind contributions. When this data is inaccurate and not closely audited, it can lead to an inflation of programming expenses and revenue, but also impacts communications to donors about the ratios of funds that support programming and mission vs. administration.

“The state regulators claim that the usage of these ratios misrepresents the size or complexity of a charity’s business operations, which constitutes a deceptive fund-raising practice and violates state charitable solicitation laws.”

—The Nonprofit Times


For example, the joint cost allocation rules set forth in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) state that organizations are permitted to allocate a portion of expenses associated with fundraising activities to programming expense only if those activities include a “call to action” that furthers its mission. In other words, the fundraising must include some valid programming element, not just a solicitation for donations. The rules also govern who receives the solicitations. It can’t be limited to large or frequent donors.

In addition, gifts in kind donations have many rules guiding their acceptance, use and accounting. State regulatory scrutiny has focused mainly on use of donated non-cash goods, valuation, recognition of revenue and expenses, and financial statement disclosures, according to the article.

If you are concerned about your organization’s allocation of joint costs and/or accounting for non-cash contributions, it may be time for a second opinion on your accounting systems or financial statements. LvHJ’s not-for-profit accounting and business advisory team and independent auditors are here to help.

Source:
The Nonprofit Times


Recent Posts

  • After the Audit: How to Assess Improvements
  • Can Total Compensation Really Make a Difference in Tax Accountant Jobs and CPA Jobs?
  • IRS Updates Tax Relief Again for California Storm Victims
  • Beware the five-year rule for Roth IRA withdrawals
  • Why You Should Get a Nonprofit Loan Right Now

Categories

  • Affordable Housing
  • Business Advisory Services
  • Case Studies
  • Charitable Giving
  • Individual Tax
  • Not For Profit
  • Professional Development
  • Tax Laws
  • Timely News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017

Tags

179 accounting careers Affordable Housing affordable housing CPA alternate valuation date audit audit planning Blog Blog Post California California storm update Careers charitable donations CPA careers employees estate estate tax executor extension IRS isolation LIHTC major gifts May 2023 mental health nonprofit Not for Profit Professional Development San Francisco succession tax Tax Credit Compliance taxes tax expert california tax jobs tax planning tax reform tax relief tax services California transfer of assets valuation date wellness will workplace year 15 buyouts

Connect with us on

  • About
  • Services
  • Expertise
  • Resources
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Client Portal
©2023 Lindquist, von Husen & Joyce LLP. All Rights Reserved.